Username
Password
Save
Forums Home
Football
The Open
Polly
Hoopty
Chat
Register
Rules
Search
Board Navigation:
Forums
|
Search
|
Index
User Settings:
Login
|
Register
10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29?
Author:
Chrisb
(5653 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:04 pm on May 8, 2012
(no message)
"Armando Allen doesn't see defenders, he sees code"
Replies to: "10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29?"
From Brian Hardin:
[
LINK
]
-
ChicagoIrish
- 11:59am 5/8/12
(64)
[View All]
Here is one person's list of fastest college football players 2011
[
LINK
]
-
CC72
- 1:09pm 5/9/12
Nice input, I like it..
-
Chrisb
- 1:44pm 5/9/12
Question: Do you think he meant fastest among ND football players who also ran track..
-
Chrisb
- 1:18pm 5/8/12
ND Rec 100m-10.2 200-20.4 - Bill Hurd
-
Karamello
- 3:33pm 5/8/12
10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29?
[NT]
-
Chrisb
- 4:04pm 5/8/12
Re: 10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29?
-
Karamello
- 4:14pm 5/8/12
It was also 100 yd, not 100 meter, which is longer
-
ND_in_ATL
- 9:46pm 5/12/12
Hurd ran 9.3 for 100 YARDS. It was converted to a 100 meter time by adding .9 of a second because
-
Irish Duck
- 1:30pm 5/14/12
Oh, okay ...anyone since then been into the 10.2s or low 10.3s besides Rocket?
-
Chrisb
- 4:19pm 5/8/12
I know Rossum was clocked as the NFL's fastest man at one point.
-
ND_in_ATL
- 9:49pm 5/12/12
I don't think nd track is known for sprinters.
-
Rocket91
- 1:24pm 5/8/12
Yeah but 10.3s are fast for HS track not college...
-
Chrisb
- 1:53pm 5/8/12
"in college track you have to be down in the 10.1s to be considered legit on the national level"
-
CC72
- 1:01pm 5/9/12
You put your " in the wrong spot "I believe in college track you have to be down in the 10.1s.."
-
Chrisb
- 1:29pm 5/9/12
Getting back to the ND track program
-
Rocket91
- 6:10pm 5/8/12
Wow, that's pretty poor...
-
Chrisb
- 6:24pm 5/8/12
Willie Clark, has the 2nd all time 200m time of 20.92. Tim Brown is 3rd all time 20.97. By the way
-
Irish Duck
- 3:44pm 5/9/12
Damn, 20.97 is flying for a guy Brown's size.
[NT]
-
Chrisb
- 3:57pm 5/9/12
Delete
[NT]
-
UMND
- 10:32pm 5/8/12
Clint Johnson I believe
-
Rocket91
- 6:57pm 5/8/12
yeah, thats him.
[NT]
-
Chrisb
- 8:09pm 5/8/12
Well....DeAnthony Thomas ran a 10.68 yesterday....
-
seascapepro23
- 3:07pm 5/8/12
What does that have to do with anything? ?
-
Chrisb
- 4:03pm 5/8/12
I agree with you.
-
seascapepro23
- 4:38pm 5/8/12
and were talking about "football players" running track...
-
Karamello
- 4:51pm 5/8/12
GAIII is not 215...get that out of your head.
-
Chrisb
- 5:29pm 5/8/12
Dude...calm down.
-
Karamello
- 6:22pm 5/8/12
I'm calm, but there is a recent pick from one of his recent track meets
-
Chrisb
- 6:27pm 5/8/12
Here, look at this pic and tell me where you see 215lbs (or even 205 for that matter)..
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
Chrisb
- 6:35pm 5/8/12
Yea, I'll say he looks pretty stripped right there.
-
Karamello
- 7:51pm 5/8/12
Huh? Dude, look at the arms, shoulders and chest...205 is being way generous and
-
Chrisb
- 8:29pm 5/8/12
Ok dude..you're saying what??
-
Karamello
- 10:42am 5/9/12
What I'm saying is, where the heck are you getting 215 from??
-
Chrisb
- 11:10am 5/9/12
Re: What I'm saying is, where the heck are you getting 215 from??
-
Karamello
- 1:52pm 5/9/12
Wow man, you are really reaching now..
-
Chrisb
- 3:03pm 5/9/12
Answer me this..
-
Karamello
- 2:01pm 5/9/12
Re: Answer me this..
-
Chrisb
- 3:31pm 5/9/12
Oh okay....my bad. so how big is this DeAnthony Thomas?
-
Chrisb
- 4:47pm 5/8/12
Oh, he is a fucking burner
-
ShowMeIrish
- 5:08pm 5/8/12
He is a damn good football player for sure, but he looks more quick than fast to me..
-
Chrisb
- 5:56pm 5/8/12
I agree. I think Davonte Neal has more of a similar skill set to Thomas
[NT]
-
seascapepro23
- 6:02pm 5/8/12
Completely agree. D. Neal is very much D. Thomas...
-
Karamello
- 6:24pm 5/8/12
Yeah, I think Neal might be the perfect combo of quicks and speed..
-
Chrisb
- 6:30pm 5/8/12
I'd take that bet actually
-
Rocket91
- 2:52pm 5/8/12
FYI, Rocket won this bet..
[
LINK
]
-
Chrisb
- 3:51pm 5/9/12
Yes the record is 10.2 but from sometime in the 1960's.
-
Flanner525
- 3:09pm 5/8/12
The generally accepted conversion from a hand time to electronic time is .24
-
Rocket91
- 3:42pm 5/8/12
So this goes back to my original question..
-
Chrisb
- 4:15pm 5/8/12
Actually a fully electronic 10.34 would be considered faster than a hand timed 10.2
-
Rocket91
- 4:36pm 5/8/12
Considered by who???
-
Chrisb
- 4:42pm 5/8/12
Well Brian Hardin disagrees with you, but I guess that's fine
-
Rocket91
- 5:29pm 5/8/12
Or maybe he doesn't and simply stated it wrong in his tweet (that happens on twitter sometimes)
-
Chrisb
- 5:38pm 5/8/12
Maybe ND just needs to update their records
-
Rocket91
- 5:56pm 5/8/12
Re: Maybe ND just needs to update their records
-
Chrisb
- 6:10pm 5/8/12
From what I have read, damn near everyone.
[
LINK
]
-
ShowMeIrish
- 4:57pm 5/8/12
I agree with that..
-
Chrisb
- 5:33pm 5/8/12
10.2 + .24 = 10.44
-
ShowMeIrish
- 4:28pm 5/8/12
It doesn't depend on that at all..
-
Chrisb
- 4:37pm 5/8/12
Truly amazing.
-
LanceHarbor
- 1:05pm 5/8/12
Full disclosure: both times are wind aided
-
Rocket91
- 12:57pm 5/8/12
Lets not forget...They're both Freshman...
-
Karamello
- 1:52pm 5/8/12
The wind doesn't negate it, I'm just pointing it out
-
Rocket91
- 2:47pm 5/8/12
That's a damn good point.
[NT]
-
Chrisb
- 4:16pm 5/8/12
That's the first thing that came to my mind...I could see them both getting into the 10.1-10.2 range
-
Chrisb
- 1:56pm 5/8/12
UHND Forum Quick Links
Football Forum
Open Forum
Political Forum
Basketball Forum