So this goes back to my original question..

Author: Chrisb (5652 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:15 pm on May 8, 2012

if the ND record is 10.2 then Rocket's 10.32 isn't the fastest ever, but the fastest by a football player.

Me thinks you owe me a buck...or you can just charge my cup at the next game we both attend.

"Armando Allen doesn't see defenders, he sees code"

Replies to: "So this goes back to my original question.."

From Brian Hardin: [LINK] - ChicagoIrish - 11:59am 5/8/12 (64) [View All]
- Here is one person's list of fastest college football players 2011 [LINK] - CC72 - 1:09pm 5/9/12
  - Nice input, I like it.. - Chrisb - 1:44pm 5/9/12
- Question: Do you think he meant fastest among ND football players who also ran track.. - Chrisb - 1:18pm 5/8/12
  - ND Rec 100m-10.2 200-20.4 - Bill Hurd - Karamello - 3:33pm 5/8/12
    - 10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29? [NT] - Chrisb - 4:04pm 5/8/12
      - Re: 10.2 what?? 10.20 or 10.29? - Karamello - 4:14pm 5/8/12
        
        It was also 100 yd, not 100 meter, which is longer - ND_in_ATL - 9:46pm 5/12/12
        
        Hurd ran 9.3 for 100 YARDS. It was converted to a 100 meter time by adding .9 of a second because - Irish Duck - 1:30pm 5/14/12
        
        Oh, okay ...anyone since then been into the 10.2s or low 10.3s besides Rocket? - Chrisb - 4:19pm 5/8/12
        
        I know Rossum was clocked as the NFL's fastest man at one point. - ND_in_ATL - 9:49pm 5/12/12
  - I don't think nd track is known for sprinters. - Rocket91 - 1:24pm 5/8/12
    - Yeah but 10.3s are fast for HS track not college... - Chrisb - 1:53pm 5/8/12
      - "in college track you have to be down in the 10.1s to be considered legit on the national level" - CC72 - 1:01pm 5/9/12
        
        You put your " in the wrong spot "I believe in college track you have to be down in the 10.1s.." - Chrisb - 1:29pm 5/9/12
      - Getting back to the ND track program - Rocket91 - 6:10pm 5/8/12
        
        Wow, that's pretty poor... - Chrisb - 6:24pm 5/8/12
        
        Willie Clark, has the 2nd all time 200m time of 20.92. Tim Brown is 3rd all time 20.97. By the way - Irish Duck - 3:44pm 5/9/12
        
        Damn, 20.97 is flying for a guy Brown's size. [NT] - Chrisb - 3:57pm 5/9/12
        
        Delete [NT] - UMND - 10:32pm 5/8/12
        
        Clint Johnson I believe - Rocket91 - 6:57pm 5/8/12
        
        yeah, thats him. [NT] - Chrisb - 8:09pm 5/8/12
      - Well....DeAnthony Thomas ran a 10.68 yesterday.... - seascapepro23 - 3:07pm 5/8/12
        
        What does that have to do with anything? ? - Chrisb - 4:03pm 5/8/12
        
        I agree with you. - seascapepro23 - 4:38pm 5/8/12
        
        and were talking about "football players" running track... - Karamello - 4:51pm 5/8/12
        
        GAIII is not 215...get that out of your head. - Chrisb - 5:29pm 5/8/12
        
        Dude...calm down. - Karamello - 6:22pm 5/8/12
        
        I'm calm, but there is a recent pick from one of his recent track meets - Chrisb - 6:27pm 5/8/12
        
        Here, look at this pic and tell me where you see 215lbs (or even 205 for that matter).. [NT] [LINK] - Chrisb - 6:35pm 5/8/12
        
        Yea, I'll say he looks pretty stripped right there. - Karamello - 7:51pm 5/8/12
        
        Huh? Dude, look at the arms, shoulders and chest...205 is being way generous and - Chrisb - 8:29pm 5/8/12
        
        Ok dude..you're saying what?? - Karamello - 10:42am 5/9/12
        
        What I'm saying is, where the heck are you getting 215 from?? - Chrisb - 11:10am 5/9/12
        
        Re: What I'm saying is, where the heck are you getting 215 from?? - Karamello - 1:52pm 5/9/12
        
        Wow man, you are really reaching now.. - Chrisb - 3:03pm 5/9/12
        
        Answer me this.. - Karamello - 2:01pm 5/9/12
        
        Re: Answer me this.. - Chrisb - 3:31pm 5/9/12
        
        Oh okay....my bad. so how big is this DeAnthony Thomas? - Chrisb - 4:47pm 5/8/12
        
        Oh, he is a fucking burner - ShowMeIrish - 5:08pm 5/8/12
        
        He is a damn good football player for sure, but he looks more quick than fast to me.. - Chrisb - 5:56pm 5/8/12
        
        I agree. I think Davonte Neal has more of a similar skill set to Thomas [NT] - seascapepro23 - 6:02pm 5/8/12
        
        Completely agree. D. Neal is very much D. Thomas... - Karamello - 6:24pm 5/8/12
        
        Yeah, I think Neal might be the perfect combo of quicks and speed.. - Chrisb - 6:30pm 5/8/12
      - I'd take that bet actually - Rocket91 - 2:52pm 5/8/12
        
        FYI, Rocket won this bet.. [LINK] - Chrisb - 3:51pm 5/9/12
        
        Yes the record is 10.2 but from sometime in the 1960's. - Flanner525 - 3:09pm 5/8/12
        
        The generally accepted conversion from a hand time to electronic time is .24 - Rocket91 - 3:42pm 5/8/12
        So this goes back to my original question.. - Chrisb - 4:15pm 5/8/12
        
        Actually a fully electronic 10.34 would be considered faster than a hand timed 10.2 - Rocket91 - 4:36pm 5/8/12
        
        Considered by who??? - Chrisb - 4:42pm 5/8/12
        
        Well Brian Hardin disagrees with you, but I guess that's fine - Rocket91 - 5:29pm 5/8/12
        
        Or maybe he doesn't and simply stated it wrong in his tweet (that happens on twitter sometimes) - Chrisb - 5:38pm 5/8/12
        
        Maybe ND just needs to update their records - Rocket91 - 5:56pm 5/8/12
        
        Re: Maybe ND just needs to update their records - Chrisb - 6:10pm 5/8/12
        
        From what I have read, damn near everyone. [LINK] - ShowMeIrish - 4:57pm 5/8/12
        
        I agree with that.. - Chrisb - 5:33pm 5/8/12
        
        10.2 + .24 = 10.44 - ShowMeIrish - 4:28pm 5/8/12
        
        It doesn't depend on that at all.. - Chrisb - 4:37pm 5/8/12
- Truly amazing. - LanceHarbor - 1:05pm 5/8/12
- Full disclosure: both times are wind aided - Rocket91 - 12:57pm 5/8/12
  - Lets not forget...They're both Freshman... - Karamello - 1:52pm 5/8/12
    - The wind doesn't negate it, I'm just pointing it out - Rocket91 - 2:47pm 5/8/12
      - That's a damn good point. [NT] - Chrisb - 4:16pm 5/8/12
    - That's the first thing that came to my mind...I could see them both getting into the 10.1-10.2 range - Chrisb - 1:56pm 5/8/12

Save

So this goes back to my original question..

Posted at 4:15 pm on May 8, 2012

Replies to: "So this goes back to my original question.."

UHND Forum Quick Links

Username
Password
Save

Username

Password

Save

So this goes back to my original question..

Posted at 4:15 pm on May 8, 2012

Replies to: "So this goes back to my original question.."

UHND Forum Quick Links