Reasons For Optimism For Notre Dame in 2017 Are In The Numbers

Notre Dame offensive line

I was called a “negative nelly” last week by one of our readers and it was glorious. I’m usually the guy who is too positive. I like to look at the bright side, especially in the offseason. It’s much more pleasant to look at things under the assumption they will improve. As my recent pieces on Brian Kelly have shown, those are assumptions I’m not willing to make. Not after 4-8. So it was nice to be portrayed as being the opposite of what I’ve been accused of my entire life. At least once.

One of the conclusions I’ve reached throughout spring ball and into the summer is how unpredictable the 2017 season really is. 2016 was shocking and in many ways it was fatally flawed before it even began.

There was the ill-fated quarterback competition between Malik Zaire and DeShone Kizer. Brian VanGorder was installing a defense that lacked in fundamentals and was scrapped following week 4 after VanGorder was dismissed. The strength program took a major hit that left the team ill-prepared for the grind of four quarter games, let alone a full season of football.

These are things that can, and did, sink a season. But, they are variables that have since been removed. There is a clear pecking order at quarterback. VanGorder is gone and his replacement has worked meticulously on improving the fundamental aspects of the defense. The strength program underwent a complete overhaul.

We know Notre Dame only won four games last year. But, were they really a four win roster? The numbers suggest no. I spent some time perusing the site footballoutsiders.com to get a better idea of what kind of team Notre Dame was on the whole in 2016. I wanted to know if the team, and specific units,  were better than conventional wisdom would suggest. I found some interesting answers.

Notre Dame Underachieved By Three Games In 2016

Football outsiders uses a formula called 2nd Order Wins, which looks at the advanced stats of a particular game, takes those stats and creates a single-game win expectancy, and compares it to the actual results of the game. Essentially, they want to know if a team is either lucky or unlucky.

Notre Dame in 2016 came out with a 2nd order win projection of 7.2, which is just over a three win differential from their actual results. It was the largest differential in all of college football, both positive and negative. Some of it can be attributed to bad luck, like having to play a football game in a literal hurricane, but also to Notre Dame simply falling apart in the 4th quarters of games.

I point this out because a lot of season projections revolve around Notre Dame being a four win team last year. It seems foolish to expect a double digit win season from a four win team the year before. But, from a seven win team? Is that so foolish or outlandish? It changes the thinking and the conversation a little bit. Our expectations could actually be a little low.

The Offensive Line Was Better Than We Think

Conventional wisdom regarding the Notre Dame offensive line in 2016 is they underachieved, especially in the run game. Again, this is all relative to expectations. But, when you take a look at the numbers provided by Football Outsiders, you’ll see they performed, on the whole, a little better than one would think.

Notre Dame’s offensive line was a top 20 unit in adjusted line yards (18th) , pass down line yards (8th), and power success rate (16th). They were also a respectable 30th in stuff rate, which is the percentage of times a running back is stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage. When you have a line that is 16th in power success rate–the percentage of times on 3rd or 4th down when a team has two or less yards and a first down is achieved–and 30th in stuff rate, you’d think that’s a recipe for running success.

Interestingly, the Irish line struggled the most on standard downs, both running (102nd in adjusted line yards) and throwing (120th in adjusted sack rate).

This strikes me as a play-calling issue, although it’s hard to identify exactly where that failure occurs without closer examination. The line blocks fine when the defense knows they have to pass, and they block fine when they know they have to run.

That leads me to believe they were too varied in their play calling, not sticking with what is working and trying to play match ups a little too often. If this is the case, it’s no wonder Kelly wanted to make a change in this area, replacing Mike Denbrock with Chip Long.

The point is, there is a quality line in there, given the right situation.

The Defensive Line Was…Good?

Well, against the run anyway.

This was easily the most heartening look back at the Notre Dame team to project what is possible for the upcoming season.

The defensive line came in at an incredible 7th in adjusted line yards, 30th in standard down line yards, and 9th in passing down line yards. They were admittedly pretty middling in the rest of the categories against the run, with a low rating of 54th in stuff rating.

And just to make clear you can’t simply manipulate numbers to make something that is really bad suddenly really good, their sack rate numbers are abysmal and atrocious.

The good news is this was a formidable run defense, and especially so when you consider they played two option teams, NC State in a hurricane, and Stanford. You can’t hide in the numbers against teams that constantly want to run the ball.

The other good news is their new defensive coordinator is very good at the thing Notre Dame was very bad at. Last year Wake Forest was 16th in adjusted sack rate, 12th in standard downs sack rate, and 14th in pass down sack rate. If Notre Dame can hold steady as they were against the run, and add a little spice to the pass rush, well, they just might have a little something there.

Special Teams Killed Notre Dame

For me, special teams is pretty simple. Either you want to be good at it, or you don’t. In 2016, Notre Dame didn’t, and if there was any single reason why a seven win team turned into a four win team, it’s because of special teams.

We don’t need to relive the horrors of what happened, we all saw the calamity, but it bears out in the numbers as well. They were ranked 81st in total special teams by FEI, which was boosted by the fact that Justin Yoon was pretty good at kicking field goals (58th in field goal efficiency) and CJ Sanders was very good at returning kickoffs (9th in kick return efficiency).

Everything else was a dumpster fire.

They were 98th in kickoff efficiency, 120th in punt return efficiency, and 121st in punting efficiency.

The good news, again, is it seems Notre Dame cares to be better at special teams this year. They hired a full time special teams coordinator, Brian Polian, who isn’t splitting time as a position coach. Frankly, it’d be hard for them to be worse in 2017, and if they did without the unintentional touching of punts and fumbling the ball into the end zone for opponent touchdowns, that may just be the difference in one or two victories.

Videos

You may also like

11 comments

  1. Damian 2 years ago

    Thanks guys, I appreciate that. I try my best. I was a BK apologist until last year. The Duke game shattered my confidence in BK and pretty much nothing short of a playoff spot will restore it. I guess I try to bridge the gap. I can’t see how BK gets the Irish out of the mess, a mess he owns. There just was no excuse to losing to Duke (not to mention Texas, and Michigan State, and most of the other 8 teams they lost to). At the same time, I can’t deny he’s made some significant changes, not just in his assistants, but according to the players his personal approach. If last year were year 3 and not year 7 (I think, I lost count) I might even be excited. But I’m tempered by how late in the game it is. But, I am a realist, nothing I say is going to change the fact BK is back next season, so while I have serious doubts, I’ll still hope next year is the year they turn it around.

    I think what SFR and others (and even myself) fear, is not another 4-8 season so much. That would be bad, but a another year like last and BK is gone. But what happens if they go 8-4? I can tell you without a doubt BK would be back. That would be heralded as “significant” improvement. The fear I have is that becomes the new standard for ND. An above average team maybe, but not elite, not really special. At what point do the true powers that be at ND, the ones that really control what goes on, start to believe that winning records are all that really matter? And yes, BK is probably good enough to give you 8-4 most years.

    I know I noted in an earlier article that under a very specific set of circumstances 8-4 this season may soften my thinking about one more year for BK after that, but I’d have to feel almost 100% confident that they are on their way to being elite. That’s not likely to happen, but I never like to say anything absolutely. And again, I’m just a fan, what I think doesn’t matter a whole lot.

    As an aside, I too am bothered to hear that SFR is being harassed outside this website. I think it’s a breach of trust for someone to send anyone unwelcome e-mails to a poster outside this board. I mean, we are all just fans here, this isn’t life or death after all.

    Reply Like Dislike
  2. southside 2 years ago

    SFR , you need to take it easy—calm yourself down. Maybe you should not be on a Notre Dame fan website. After all — it is a ND fan website. So , expect backlash from fellow posters on your 365 days a year Debbie Downer/Negative Nancy rants. What you seem to neglect—are that we ND fans are in agreement with you — if you follow the posts. But , the difference is — ND fans won’t give up “Hope , Optimism or Spirit—each new season. We fans are as frustrated as you are of ND not winning a NC Title since 1988. We life long fans don’t accept excuses or mediocrity — like you falsely claim. But , as a lifelong ND fan — I refuse to listen to some idiot on this website try to kill my “Hope , Optimism and Spirit” or your latest BS of “Magical Thinking.” One more thing — poster Damian is one of the best in commenting on ND football–since I’ve been on this website.

    Reply Like Dislike
  3. SteelFanRob 2 years ago

    One more thing, Southside, stop making excuses for garbage performance. You want to cheer on poor CFB, go root for BC. That seems to be more your spped!

    Reply Like Dislike
  4. SteelFanRob 2 years ago

    Southside,

    I guess the public school system of Boston must not teach basic reading.

    So sorry for your poor verbal comprehension.

    But keep on reading. One day you might just master the king’s English.

    Reply Like Dislike
  5. duranko 2 years ago

    Last year is gone. Does it strain credulity to think that the ’17 team may be as different from the ’16 team as the ’16 team was from ’15? Remember, in ’15 we were one late stop against Stanford from being in the Final four.

    Lost in the hand-wringing about Kelly and the Chicken Littles that now populate Notre Dame fandom is that this is a
    remarkably deep and experienced offensive unit. There is only one offense that ND plays in the regular season that has a chance to be as good as the Irish, and that’s SC. The Irish have more experience, but it is Darnold’s explosive late season performance that would give the Trojans an edge.

    But this is a very experienced offensive line, an experienced TE corps that brings back a potentially great player in Mack, a deep running back corps (I mean, we won’t even miss Folston) and a wide receiving corps, if Stepherson is part of it, that is experienced and deep. Don’t sleep on Freddy Canteen, either.

    The quarterback? He lacks game experience, but Notre Dame has had first year starters succeed:
    Lujack
    HANRATTY
    Huarte
    McDougall
    Golson
    Kizer

    Besides, Mr. Wimbush might, just might, have “it.”

    There is a gorilla in the room with the lack of playable depth on the Front Four. Otherwise, there is talent and depth on the defense, and you know, with Yoon and Newsome and Sanders, Polian will have a solid special teams corps.

    PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT PREDICT FUTURE RESULTS.
    2015 did not predict 2016.
    2016 may-or may not-predict 2017

    I can’t speak for the whiners, the quitters, the princesses laying on peas.

    But I’ll be watching with some level of enthusiasm. After all, We are ND.

    Reply Like Dislike
  6. Carlos 2 years ago

    The concern about ND Football is that it got so bad so quickly, and Coach Kelly did not foresee this

    Reply Like Dislike
  7. Damian 2 years ago

    Some of this gets a little bit into the weeds, but I generally agree. ND had the players to be a better team, but it goes back to poor coaching on a number of levels. They did not adequately prepare the players, and to make it worse there were poor play calls made in every level. The team was just not put in a position to win.

    On paper, this year should be better. They overhauled the coaching staff, retooled the conditioning program and just made fundamental changes. Also, there is little to no drama this year. That’s why I said in an earlier post, this year is almost refreshing in the sense that there’s no soap opera issues, no QB controversy. Outside the fans nobody really is even talking about ND right now. Since BK’s job security isn’t immediately at risk, the media has sort of moved on for now (now all that can change in a second once the season starts–but until the games start it’s settled). The way last season turned out at 4-8, I’m sort of glad ND is being largely ignored right now. I have my doubts BK is the right man to turn things around. But the lack of controversies allows the players to focus on just simply playing the game. For once, that alone may be refreshing. Then we’ll see if BK’s changes bear fruit. I just want ND to win FB games now.

    Reply Like Dislike