The San Francisco Chronicle Needs a DVR

Apparently Jim Harbaugh isn’t the only person in the Bay Area complaining about a play that they seem to think happened.  Harbaugh opened his press conference on Saturday complaining about the interference penalty on Stanford at the end of the second quarter.

Here’s what the Chronicle had to say:

Harbaugh was not thinking about Stanford’s postseason when he came down on the officiating with an unsolicited verbal barrage. He was angry about a play on a Stanford punt in the second quarter with the Irish leading 14-7. The kick bounced off the hands of Irish returner Armando Allen and was recovered by Stanford at the Irish 37-yard line. However, officials called Stanford’s Nate Wilcox-Fogel for interfering with the catch, even though replays suggested otherwise.

Now, I am not sure what replay Jake Curtis, the author of the Chronicle article,  is referring to, but the one on my DVR clearly shows that the ball NEVER touched Armando Allen – let alone his hands.   The ball does, however, hit Stanford’s #85 – Nate Wilcox.  Now, if someone wants to argue that there shouldn’t have been a 15 yard penalty on the play, that I could at least understand.  Then again, if the ball hit a Stanford player, it seems to me like that might prevent a punt returner from catching the ball.

The fact of the matter, however, is that the ball never touched Allen.  It never touched Sergio Brown, who did bump into Allen. It did hit Wilcox.  So the best case scenario for Stanford on the play is that the ball should have been dead at the spot Wilcox touched it and that is exactly what color commentator Pat Hayden said during the broadcast.

Curtis did at least get one thing right that Harbaugh didn’t.  Harbaugh, who apparently doesn’t know the NCAA rulebook too well yet thought the play should have been a fumble recovered by Stanford and returned for a touchdown.  As Curtis correctly points out, even if Allen had touched the ball (which he didn’t), it would have been a muffed punt which could not be advanced by the kicking team.

Actually, it would have been a muff, and recovering players cannot advance a muff, but it still would have been Stanford’s ball. Instead, Notre Dame had the ball at the Stanford 48-yard line and turned it into a score that made it 21-7.

In This Story

Frank Vitovitch has been Co-Owner and Editor in Chief of UHND.com since joining forces with Kyle Flavin in 1999. Since that time, he has written over 2,000 articles covering Notre Dame football, recruiting, and basketball. He also works with all staff and external writers on all articles published on UHND.com. Frank's love for Notre Dame football started at a young age watching Rocket Ismail give opposing coaches ulcers in the late 1980's. By day Frank works in marketing and holds a degree in Digital Media from Drexel University. Frank's work has been cited by online/print editions of NBC Sports, ESPN, and Sports Illustrated and has been quoted on air by ESPN's Collin Cowherd. He's conducted interviews with Notre Dame legends Rocket Ismail, Randy Kinder, Lee Becton, Reggie Brooks, Michael Stonebreaker, and Ned Bolcar among others over his 20+ years of covering Notre Dame football. He's also been published in the print edition of USA Today Sports Weekly and the USA Today College Football Preview multiple times. Other Published Works/Citations for Frank Three Reasons Notre Dame Will Beat Alabama - USA Today Notre Dame Suspends WR Kevin Stepherson, RB C.J. Holmes Indefinitely - Bleacher Report Notre Dame / Ohio State Fiesta Bowl Preview - Eleven Warriors Brace Yourself: The Fighting Irish are Relevant Again - Sports on Earth Interviews with the Enemy: A Q&A with Frank Vitovitch of UHND - Yahoo! Sports Five Good Minutes: Notre Dame Football Preview With UHND.com - BC Interruption Vicious Electronic Questioning with UHND - MGO Blog

Comments

2 RESPONSES

  1. JCOCT 6, 2008 · 9:58AM

    Finally, some calls are going our way for a change. The good news is the Win is in the book.

    I am glad Harbough is Blind

  2. patOCT 6, 2008 · 9:46AM

    what do you expect from pac-10 officials….they are terrible!!