Notre Dame Wouldn’t Decline Bowl Bid

After the 1996 season, a three loss Irish team turned down bowl bids for lesser tier bowls.  This year a five or fix loss Irish team would do no such thing according to Charlie Weis.  On Sunday Weis addressed that scenario.

I think the downside of not going to a Bowl game is the extra practice that you miss to develop your younger players. No one’s jumping up and down to go to a Bowl, if you were to lose the game and end up 6-6, no one is jumping up and down to do that.

But at the same time that’s multiple practices and development that could be going on that you end up losing out on. And I think in your program’s sake I think it ends up hurting you in the long run.

Going to a bowl game this year is very important because it is clear that the team can use the practice.  How much good would the extra month of practice time do?  It’s hard to say, but any extra practice time could do this team good – especially if Weis is going to continue to call the plays and be more involved with the offense.  If Weis returns next year and is more involved in the offense again, as he was in 2005 and 2006, bowl practices will give him a jump start to getting back into the grove of things.

The bowl picture is a bit cloudy for Notre Dame right now though after the loss to Syracuse.  I will have a post later tonight or tomorrow with more details on Notre Dame’s bowl options.

Frank Vitovitch has been Co-Owner and Editor in Chief of UHND.com since joining forces with Kyle Flavin in 1999. Since that time, he has written over 2,000 articles covering Notre Dame football, recruiting, and basketball. He also works with all staff and external writers on all articles published on UHND.com. Frank's love for Notre Dame football started at a young age watching Rocket Ismail give opposing coaches ulcers in the late 1980's. By day Frank works in marketing and holds a degree in Digital Media from Drexel University. Frank's work has been cited by online/print editions of NBC Sports, ESPN, and Sports Illustrated and has been quoted on air by ESPN's Collin Cowherd. He's conducted interviews with Notre Dame legends Rocket Ismail, Randy Kinder, Lee Becton, Reggie Brooks, Michael Stonebreaker, and Ned Bolcar among others over his 20+ years of covering Notre Dame football. He's also been published in the print edition of USA Today Sports Weekly and the USA Today College Football Preview multiple times. Other Published Works/Citations for Frank Three Reasons Notre Dame Will Beat Alabama - USA Today Notre Dame Suspends WR Kevin Stepherson, RB C.J. Holmes Indefinitely - Bleacher Report Notre Dame / Ohio State Fiesta Bowl Preview - Eleven Warriors Brace Yourself: The Fighting Irish are Relevant Again - Sports on Earth Interviews with the Enemy: A Q&A with Frank Vitovitch of UHND - Yahoo! Sports Five Good Minutes: Notre Dame Football Preview With UHND.com - BC Interruption Vicious Electronic Questioning with UHND - MGO Blog

Comments

4 RESPONSES

  1. JCNOV 26, 2008 · 11:38AM

    I wonder if CW will take the same motivational approach for the bowl game as USC.

    “DON’T GET ON THE PLANE IF YOU DON’T THINK YOU CAN WIN.”

  2. JCNOV 26, 2008 · 11:14AM

    Lou would be an outstanding choice, I am quite sure as an ESPN commentator, he aware of contemporary offensive approaches.

    Lou is an innovatitive thinker and I would expect he would have a new offensive system in mind for today standards, by picking the right offensive coodinator as well as defensive coodinator.

  3. Jake WNOV 26, 2008 · 9:41AM

    I highly doubt that would happen, for starters. And for as much as I love Lou and wish he was my grandfather, his offensive ideologies are a bit outdated.

  4. Ghost of Jerry CooneyNOV 25, 2008 · 10:28PM

    From here in Shoot-cago (currently the murder capital of the US) i heard on espn radio that Lou Holtz was the only one who would take the ND job let alone want it. Anyone think this is a good choice or the only choice? If he could stick around for 3-4 years he could possibly restore the pride that this team seems to be lacking IF he is ever offered.