Buyout Not an Issue for Notre Dame?

During the 4th quarter of the Notre Dame-USC game tonight Holly Rowe reported that she had a conversation with Notre Dame AD Jack Swarbrick and her report was anything but a ringing endorsement for Charlie Weis.

In a nutshell, Swarbrick said that the only thing that will be considered is what is best for the student athlete and based on what she said, it sounded as though Swarbrick was saying the buyout was not an issue and wouldn’t be a deciding factor on what Notre Dame will do with Charlie Weis.

Given the opportunity to defend Weis and give him a vote of confidence, he did not according to Rowe and that speaks volumes.

The only positive comment from Swarbrick was that we have had two great recruiting class in a row and are on the verge of another.

Also, since they did not show the interview with Swarbrick, take all of these comments with a grain of salt even though I’m sure a quality news service like ESPN wouldn’t only report what made the best story right?

In This Story

Frank Vitovitch has been Co-Owner and Editor in Chief of UHND.com since joining forces with Kyle Flavin in 1999. Since that time, he has written over 2,000 articles covering Notre Dame football, recruiting, and basketball. He also works with all staff and external writers on all articles published on UHND.com. Frank's love for Notre Dame football started at a young age watching Rocket Ismail give opposing coaches ulcers in the late 1980's. By day Frank works in marketing and holds a degree in Digital Media from Drexel University. Frank's work has been cited by online/print editions of NBC Sports, ESPN, and Sports Illustrated and has been quoted on air by ESPN's Collin Cowherd. He's conducted interviews with Notre Dame legends Rocket Ismail, Randy Kinder, Lee Becton, Reggie Brooks, Michael Stonebreaker, and Ned Bolcar among others over his 20+ years of covering Notre Dame football. He's also been published in the print edition of USA Today Sports Weekly and the USA Today College Football Preview multiple times. Other Published Works/Citations for Frank Three Reasons Notre Dame Will Beat Alabama - USA Today Notre Dame Suspends WR Kevin Stepherson, RB C.J. Holmes Indefinitely - Bleacher Report Notre Dame / Ohio State Fiesta Bowl Preview - Eleven Warriors Brace Yourself: The Fighting Irish are Relevant Again - Sports on Earth Interviews with the Enemy: A Q&A with Frank Vitovitch of UHND - Yahoo! Sports Five Good Minutes: Notre Dame Football Preview With UHND.com - BC Interruption Vicious Electronic Questioning with UHND - MGO Blog

Comments

7 RESPONSES

  1. JCNOV 30, 2008 · 5:47AM

    I agree with bleed, an upstart no name coach will not be hired.

    At this point, only a big name coach will work to retain the recruiting. And even then you still loose some, no matter what, ie; RichRod Mich.

    So for all intensive purposes, this situation is a definately a tough call either way. I am glad I don’t have to make it!

    One things for sure, many of the four and five star recruits would decommit and choose a stable big name college program and coach, not Cincy.

  2. svenghaliNOV 30, 2008 · 3:10AM

    Is there a reason 5 years isn’t the de facto minimum coaching term anymore?

  3. bleednd82NOV 29, 2008 · 11:12PM

    Jacob,
    I agree that money isnt an issue. I dont agree with your “source”. I will quote:

    Jacob
    November 29th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    “A source of mine told me that if a move to fire Weis is made, that it will be made on Tuesday or Wednesday and the most likely cantidate would be Brian Kelly from the University of Cincinnati”.

    Brian Kelly? No way.

    I personally dont think they will get rid of CW due to the fact they fired Ty after 3 yrs. Gives ND kinda bad rep. Also, CW is playing with mostly Fr, Soph’s and has a Top 10 recruiting class coming in. It’s his 5th yr and usually thats the president at most schools. There is still a game to be played in December. 6-6 Irish go to a bowl. A W gives you 7-6. That is a “significant” improvement over a 3-9 team dont you think? Jacob?

  4. JacobNOV 29, 2008 · 10:41PM

    Ok. I went back and read from a previous story. Weis’s should have two clauses on buyouts. One, if a college or professional team wanted Weis than they would pay the buyout price to get him. Two, if he isn’t performing than Notre Dame can get rid of him at a certain rate.

    I should have said it was an iffy source but I think there’s some good logic behind the 4 million amount.

    Why would the university shoot themselves in the foot? I’m sure they have a lower rate for if he is fired for performance reasons because the university wouldn’t want to pay very much to get rid of a coach.

    And, I think we all know that if the boosters want someone gone that its very easy for them to collect a couple million.

  5. JacobNOV 29, 2008 · 10:35PM

    Ok, bleednd82, what makes you think that Weis is staying?

    And, again? What was our first disagreement?

  6. bleednd82NOV 29, 2008 · 9:28PM

    Jacob again,
    Yeah Right.

  7. JacobNOV 29, 2008 · 9:16PM

    The fact that the AD would even say that the buyout isn’t an issue should tell you that Weis is on his way out.